Legality or Biological Fact?
2005.07.16 10:19

I am going to propose a more extreme case which is more spotlighted to the issue. One married couple was thought to be no biological offspring but adopted a child who has no biological lineage with his parents who adopted him. Only later a husband appeared to have a child between anoter woman and him. The child is biologically connected with his father but on paper he remained to be an illegitimate and his father's adopted child is legitimate.
Suppose his bilogical child were certified through scientific method -DNA test or somethng.
Which should be regarded as his succeessor, just ignoring the father's will?