The Difference in Terror and Terrorism
2005.07.12 2:28

Terror is rather separated incident or just being considered to be anyway it does not necessarily have to do with entire movement by some sects, or belief, etc.
Terrorism is a belief that some political agenda has to be achieved by use of force in a peacetime with resort to violence, the idea is previously or primarily represented by the theorem Karl Marx expressed suscinctly in his political manifesto. Lenin did too in his statement somewhere.
Obviously the roots of terrorism is deeper than the single incident of terror. The most important thing we all have to bear it in our mind is we've got to head for the society where we don't have to resort to means of violence to achieve any political ends.
Kant used to write I believe 'For the sake of world peace' ( In addition in the Russian terms, world/ mir and peace/mir are so similar. ) League of Nations was established for the world to realise peaceful settlement in conficts and The United Nations too.
The use of force certainly bears another possibility of use of force from the other side that the forces were used. Vicious circles never cease. It is the most important to thing to meet the agreement both sides can accept. Now the age is not the Tower of Babel built. The time is nigh- Everyone can understand one common language- the differnce in language caused lots of difficulty in understanding each other in ancient Babylon. People dispersed widely and greatly in order to fill in this tiny sphere. Now thanks to the globalisation it is possible for all the people to understand.
People, be wise.